Transportation Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE
Vol. 43, No. 3, August 2009, pp. 321-335
DOI: 10.1287/trsc.1090.0264
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fischetti, M.
Right arrow Articles by Zanette, A.

Fast Approaches to Improve the Robustness of a Railway Timetable

Matteo Fischetti, Domenico Salvagnin, Arrigo Zanette

Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, 1 35131-Padova, Italy
Department of Pure and Applied Mathematics, University of Padova, 1 35121-Padova, Italy
Department of Pure and Applied Mathematics, University of Padova, 1 35121-Padova, Italy

matteo.fischetti{at}unipd.it
salvagni{at}math.unipd.it
zanettea{at}dei.unipd.it

The train timetabling problem (TTP) consists of finding a train schedule on a railway network that satisfies some operational constraints and maximizes some profit function that accounts for the efficiency of the infrastructure usage. In practical cases, however, the maximization of the objective function is not enough, and one calls for a robust solution that is capable of absorbing, as much as possible, delays/disturbances on the network. In this paper we propose and computationally analyze four different methods to improve the robustness of a given TTP solution for the aperiodic (noncyclic) case. The approaches combine linear programming (LP) and ad hoc stochastic programming/robust optimization techniques. We computationally compare the effectiveness and practical applicability of the four techniques under investigation on real-world test cases from the Italian railway company Trenitalia. The outcome is that two of the proposed techniques are very fast and provide robust solutions of comparable quality with respect to the standard (but very time consuming) stochastic programming approach.

Key Words: timetabling; integer programming; robustness; stochastic programming; robust optimization
History: Received: December 2007; revised: November 2008; accepted: January 2009.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by INFORMS.